Opinions:

 

The NCMB offers a database of opinions for the years 2000 onward, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search box above.

The court denied the Bankruptcy Administrator's motion to dismiss this case pursuant to sections 707(b)(1) and 707(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code; based on the totality of the Debtor's financial circumstances the court dtermined that the Debtor may remain in her Chapter 7 case and receive her discharge.

Dismissal, Published No

Objection to secured claim of second mortgage creditor overruled.  The second mortgage creditor obtained a pre-petition state court judgment against the Debtor.  The note evidencing the indebtedness owed to such creditor merged into the judgment.  However, under North Carolina law the deed of trust securing the indebtedness remains in place.

Claims, Published No

Defendant repossessed Plaintiffs' vehicle postpetition and failed to return it despite numerous requests.  Plaintiffs are entitled to actual damages, attorney's fees, and punitive damages from the Defendant.

Automatic Stay, Published No

The Bankruptcy Administrator filed a motion to dismiss the Debtors' case pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1307(c) based on a lack of good faith in light of the misrepresentations and omissions in their schedules.  In their case the Debtors provided timely responses to the auditor, provided creditble explanations for their omissions and misstatements, and promptly amended their schedules.  Considering the totality of the circumstances in this case , a dismissal on the basis of bad faith is not warranted.

Dismissal, Published No

Based on the totality of the circumstances in this case, the first mortgage lender's amended claim, filed 50 months after the Trustee first began disbursing monthly mortgage payments to the lender under the Debtors' plan, is disallowed

Claims, Published No

The court granted in rem relief to the creditor pursuant to its motion for relief from stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(4), whereby a third party, not the debtor, engaged in a scheme to delay or hinder the creditor's foreclosure proceedings in certain real property with multiple purported transfers of title.

Automatic Stay, Published No

The court sustained the Debtors' objections to the claims of the oversecured creditor, Carolina Farm Credit, ACA, which included 15% of the outstanding balance of the indebtedness owed by the Debtors on the petition date as attorneys' fees.  The court will  review all attorneys' fees in oversecured creditors' claims for reasonableness under the Fourth Circuit standards.

Fees/Compensation, Published Yes

The Debtor filed its current case on the next to the last day of the upset bid period following a report of foreclosure sale on its real property.  The Debtor's prior Chapter 11 case was dismissed earlier after the automatic stay had been lifted on the Debtor's property and no substantial assets remained in the case.  The current case was dismissed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b) based upon a lack of subjective good faith in filing the current case, the objective futility of the Debtor's reorganization, and the lack of any material change of circumstances from the time of the dismissal of the prior case to the filing of the current case.

Dismissal, Published No

Cause exists to dismiss the Chapter 11 case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b) and no evidence was offered to support a finding that the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee is in the best interest of creditors and the estate.

Dismissal, Published No
In re Carter (17-50262) 05/11/2017
(Judge: Lena M. James)

Serial Debtor filed a petition under Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code. On motions to dismiss by multiple creditors, the court concluded that the Debtor was ineligible to seek relief under Chapter 12 as the sale of gravel does not constitute farming. Further, the case was dismissed for having been filed in bad faith.

Dismissal, Published No

Pages

Subscribe to Opinions: